It's time again for our incoming students to get their Bible software. At
our seminary, students are required basically to have a year of Greek grammar and
another year of Greek reading connected with our Gospels and Paul classes. This
is still not enough time to expect students to be able simply to pick up a Greek
NT and start reading. I am quite aware of the various arguments about how Greek
should be taught and the pros/cons of Bible software, but we have decided to
make Bible software an integral part of our Greek instruction. As for Hebrew, it
is not a requirement, but many of our students do end up taking at least a
semester of Hebrew and can follow it up with additional reading courses. For
this brief introduction to Hebrew, the software is a critical part of the
instruction.
We have "required" students to use Bible software, and we do think it is an
excellent investment not only for seminary but for their lifelong ministry, but
we are also aware that it can be a significant investment. We encourage students
to bring their systems to class so that they can use the software as we go
along, but for those who don't have a portable system or who have not purchased
the software, we have installed Bible software on quite a few seminary systems
to which they have access.
Now, what Bible software should they get? There are some free options which
work quite well. I recommend
e-Sword,
LaParola, or
The Word. These are fine programs, but they
aren't as fully capable as one of the big three:
Accordance,
BibleWorks, or
Logos. So, which of these should a
student get? Ideally, we would all have the same operating system (and same
version of said OS) and the same Bible software package (and same version of
said software). Up to just a couple years ago, this was impossible because of
the Win/Mac divide, but it really wasn't too big of a deal because we had so few
Mac users. Today, I'm seeing many more Mac users, so the issue has become more
complicated. With some limitations, it has been possible all along to run
Accordance on a PC using the Basilisk emulator and to run BibleWorks or Logos on
a Mac using one of the Windows emulators. Logos, commendably, was the first to develop both
Win and Mac versions. Accordance has recently
announced
work on a Win version. BibleWorks is cooperating with
CrossOver to provide an easy way for it to work on a Mac.
Unfortunately, matters are becoming more complicated since now
students are also coming to class with their smartphones, iPads, or Android
tablets, and Windows8 tablets are now on the near horizon as well. Logos, commendably again, has
been particularly active in providing multi-platform options and is available
for iPhone, iPad, Android, Kindle, Win, Mac, and also accessible as a web-based
resource at
Biblia.com. Accordance has an
app for iPhone and iPad. BibleWorks has already been
demonstrated working on a
Win8 tablet. UPDATE: And now
BibleWorks has made it possible to run it natively (i.e., you don't need Windows) on a Mac.
So, where does this leave our students as we ask them to buy
Bible software? As attractive as it would be, we have been reluctant to choose
one of them and make it a requirement. Each of these programs has their
particular strengths and drawbacks. In practice, what has happened is that we
have a few people using Accordance, a few using Logos, but the majority are
using BibleWorks. Why? First, part of it is history. About 10 years ago at our
seminary, everyone was using Windows and the software the Bible faculty was
using was the old Bible Windows. It was a functional program (I couldn't have
done my dissertation without it), but for a number of reasons, it was surpassed
by other programs. (Actually, Bible Windows is still available, now as
Bibloi 8.0, and
is a very capable $95 program.) We considered both Logos and BibleWorks, and at
that time, BibleWorks was clearly a better program for working directly with the
biblical texts and was significantly cheaper as well. The Bible faculty
(somewhat reluctantly) made the switch to BibleWorks, and it was also installed
on the classroom and campus systems. Today, then, there is simply inertia to
stay with a system that we know how to use, has been paid for, and is widely
available on campus. Second, it is appealing for students to have BibleWorks
when they can see it being used by the instructor in class and follow along on
their own systems. I know Logos well enough to show students how to use it. The
Accordance users band together and help each other out (and claim that it is
intuitive enough not to need any help!). Third, in terms of what we are asking
students to be able to do, BibleWorks is the cheapest and really the best
'value.' With student discounts, the full BibleWorks program costs about the
same as the Original Languages Collection in Accordance or the Original
Languages Library in Logos. Compare what is included in each. For obtaining
access to the Hebrew and Greek texts (and associated text critical resources)
and a range of English Bible versions along with lexical resources, apocryphal
and pseudepigraphal texts, Philo, Joesphus, and early Church texts, BibleWorks
is hard to beat. (BTW, I commend Accordance for the new "collections" they offer
in Accordance10 rather than the bundles of
the previous version which I found to be very confusing.)
Again, I am aware of other factors that go into 'value'
(usability, interface, multi-platform support, library management features,
inclusion of non-biblical resources, etc.), so that is why we haven't settled on
one as the required package. Given the other factors I mention, it does explain
why we are mostly running BibleWorks. I'd be interesting in hearing what other
institutions have chosen to do.